Einstein Technology & Human Resource Audit
>(Draft for comment)
Each school or group that wishes to join or is considering to do so is asked to take the time to self-administer a brief ‘technology and human resources’ audit. The goal is to make a quick first determination of the school’s suitability for participation in the Beta Test phase of the Basque Global Laboratory Curriculum in 1996/97.
The audits are designed to be easy to do and entirely self-administered. The following represents the first draft of the guidelines that have been developed to guide the audit. It is intended at this point for comment and further development, with a view to a first set of trial runs of the audit beginning in December of this year.
Contents:
1. Introduction
2. Related Curriculum & Activities
3. Learning Disabilities/Limitations
4. Computer hardware
5. Software & Supporting Didactic Materials
6. Telecommunications
7. Other Related Hardware
8. Human Resources
9. Financial Resources & Support
10. For further information & comment
1. Introduction
Because Einstein involves the frequent use of computers and telecommunications by the participating students, it is important that a reasonable base of facilities and faculty support skills be in place. It is the goal of the resource audit to help each school determine what they already have in place and what they might need in addition in order to be able to handle their participation in an orderly and efficient manner.
A secondary advantage of the audit is that it provides the school with a basis for thinking about its New Learning and Information Society programs more generally. Since computers and telecommunications are, for better or worse, going to be a major part of the new education curriculum in virtually all of our schools, the resource audit therefore appears to us to be a handy thing to carry out under any circumstances.
These guidelines are now available in draft form in both English and Basque. In the drafts ample room is left for you to record your comments and suggestions, which we hope you will fax or email to us at the addresses indicated on the last page below. The first Beta Test audits are being carried out in close contact with the Einstein team, with a view to making real time adjustments as conditions suggest or warrant. When completed the results can be reviewed in conference with the school team and the local Einstein team, as a first step toward making decisions about what might best be done next.
2. Related Curriculum & Activities
At first view, many of the Einstein sub-programs may give the impression of being for the most part technology-driven. But this is not at all the case. In these projects and activities, computer and telecommunications technologies are seen not as ends in themselves but as mediating devices, and in particular as instruments which can fa-cilitate the transition to new approaches to learning, education, and personal development.
As a firm reminder of this, we suggest that the Resource Audit begin with a quick review of the school’s or place’s related activities and interests. Here are the sorts of questions that we suggest can be usefully considered in opening up the auditing exercise:
- Does the school presently offer any programs or classes that relate to the Global Lab skills and topics (for example, environmental studies programs)?
- Would the Einstein programs you are considering compete with or complement these on-going or planned activities?
- Does the school make active use of field trips and site studies such as the GLC uses?
- Are inter-disciplinary courses and projects accepted?
- Are there regional or national programs that support such courses or activities?
- Do you foresee any problem if students build their own scientific instruments and use them to monitor the conditions in their environment?
3. Learning Disabilities/Limitations
Einstein places great stress on the potential for making use of the equipment and the pedagogical approaches which are used in programs such as the Global Lab to pro-vide help for those students with learning and reading problems. Likewise, we have been struck at their potential for helping some students with attitude and behavioral problems fight their way back into the mainstream of the formal educational system (or, alternatively, validate themselves in terms of alternative learning streams and sys-tems.. since the objective of school is not to be good at school but to be good at life).
- What proportion of the students have reading or learning disorders such as dyslexia, auditory problems, attention deficit disorders, etc.
- Are there special remedial programs for these?
- Do any of these involve computers, more innovative media, etc.?
- Has any attempt been made to give students with behavioral problems some kinds of possibly privileged access to computers and other kind of alternative learning envi-ronments?
- Are there any faculty members, administrators, nurses, parents or community groups with particular interests in these areas who might wish to consider some modest test programs in these areas?
4. Computer hardware
Computers have been brought into our schools in many places since the late 1970’s, often in considerable numbers. Today they are used for a variety of administrative functions, as well as for research and class support. Many schools have computer labs in one form or another, usually places in which computer skills are taught, more often than not however with only minimal if any relationship to the rest of the curriculum. The audit should make an attempt to identify every computer with reference to the following criteria:
- Type: (IBM PC, Mac, other, including portables.)
- Specifications: (OS, RAM, HD, video/color capability,
- Peripherals: (Video, sound, scanners, input devices, etc.)
- Age and condition:
- Where located:
- Used by whom/for what (educational, administrative):
- Approximate number hours used/week: days/year:
- Conditions of availability and access:
- Who provides maintenance?
- Approximate local price of new installation in support of GLC?
- Plans for new acquisitions?
- What does school do with old computers?
- Is there a plan or program for student purchase at good prices?
- Can community use computer facilities when not used by students?
5. Software & Supporting Learning Materials
In many schools, computers are used in the main for learning about computers, together with a "general education" in the more popular software that is useful to stu-dents. Typically, this means word processing, spread sheets, databases, presentational software, and possibly software as needed to support Internet and WWW use. In some schools specific bits of software for science programs is taught and made available. The goal of the software audit is just this: to provide a quick overview of the software that is both available and being taught and used in the various courses and activities of the school.
- Main programs, version numbers and year of purchase?
- Used by whom, for what?
- Does school make effort to ensure that manufacturers’ license agreements are fully respected?
- Does school belong to a consortium of computer users for group purchase, support?
- What is done with old programs that are no longer used?
- Would school be willing to give older software to other, less advantaged users?
6. Telecommunications
It seems ironic that telephones have been around for a century now, but that they are almost never found in classrooms. Only recently with Internet and databases have they begun to penetrate the formal learning environment. This part of the survey is intended merely to identify the number and location of phone lines and related facilities, with a view to getting a handle on this important element of the overall technology package.
- Number and type of phone lines coming into the school?
- ISDN?
- Cable?
- Fiber optics?
- Availability in class rooms?
- Internet access?
- World Wide Web access?
- Use of the above?
- Time and cost for installing new lines? (of each main type)
- Does local phone company provide technical support, training or special prices for school?
7. Other Related Hardware
- Scientific and testing instruments that might be useful in support of school’s Global Lab field projects?
- Is television used as an instructional tool in any of the courses? Which ones and how?
- Learning and instructional programs involving video or audio cassettes?
- Learning in which the use of media plays an important role
- Other forms of "distance education"?
8. Human Resources
The several programs that Einstein proposes are entirely dependent on the skill, intellectual curiosity, energy, dedication and leadership abilities of the teachers and ad-ministrators in the cooperating school. The computer-related skills can be learned by anyone with the right attitude and dedication in a period of a few months, even if they are starting from zero. In truth, the technical challenges are in the final analysis far less important than human challenges.
- Teacher skill levels?
- Teacher attitudes and role expectations (including openness to new pedagogical models)?
- Training programs for teachers and administrators?
- Who has taken the lead in developing such programs thus far?
- Is interest likely to be confined to science teachers and courses alone?
- Or can social sciences, the arts and other teachers and courses be persuaded to participate as well?
- Student skill levels
- Parent skills and capabilities?
- Home use of computers?
- Technical backup and support from outside the school (neighboring universities, business groups, local government, etc.)?
- Who is going to provide the necessary leadership?
9. Financial Resources & Support
It is often claimed that not much can be done with these new technologies because they are simply too expensive for schools that already have enough financial problems of their own. In point of fact, this may or may not be true. The range of learning and remedial programs that Einstein encompasses can often find funding and support in other places than the traditional educational budget. Then again, it may be possible to do a lot more than you might think with relatively little money. In any event a very careful and highly imaginative look at the financial side is much recommended.
- Who pays for the above hardware, software, and services?
- Routines for purchasing new hardware, software, support services?
- Is additional financial support available for any of the Einstein programs ? From whom?
- Is it possible that there may be yet other sources of financial support, equipment, etc. that are worth looking into?
- Is local government a potential partner?
- Who locally might be a source of additional (used) equipment?
- Are their parents or parent groups that might be interested in helping such a program along? How?
- Computer clubs or user groups who might be interested to help out?
- Local businesses, institutions of higher education or training, foundations, banks, etc., prepared to help?
10. For further information & comment
In the Basque Country & Spain:
Mrs. Carmen Sanz, Director
c/o Leber , Apartado 79
48930 Las Arenas - Bizkaia, Spain
Phone: 4-464-3355 Fax: 34-4-464-3562
email: 101334,3265@compuserve.com
For Global Labs generally:
Dr. Boris Berenfeld, Senior Scientist
Global Lab Project (TERC)
2067 Massachusetts Avenue
02140 Cambridge - MA, USA
Phone: 617-547-0430
Fax: 161-734-93535
email: boris_berenfeld@qm.terc.edu
For Einstein in Europe & International:
F. E. K. Britton
EcoPlan International
The Network for Tech-nology & Systems Studies
10, rue Joseph Bara
F-75006 Paris, France
Phone: 0-14.32.61.323, Fax: 0-14.32.60.746
email: 100336.2154@compuserve.com
[Top of Page]
Go to Einstein Home Page

|Index
|The Commons
| Elec-Env
| Access
|InfoSociety
| NewWork
| Vancouver
| STEP
|EcoPlan
Page last
updated by WebMeister
on 4 December 1996
Copyright © 1994-1996, EcoPlan International, Paris,
France. ® All rights reserved.