|
|
Future Briefs - Work Pad -
|
Here for now you will find a first set of working materials that are being assembled for now in a semi-strucutred way to support and eventually perhaps argue for new Briefs. This is work in progress and intended at this point only as a first reference and organizational tool. You can expect to see these initial entries expanded considerably as new information and feedback is received here and as they move up the line toward actually becoming full Briefs, and as new topics added as the underlying research process progresses. (Click here for the full listing.)
Each Brief is supported by its own editorial panel. You can see more about how that works by clicking here.
Here are a couple of first working references on this. Think of these as first raw materials. (And PS, don't necessarily believe everything you encounter here.)
Initial BRT discussions in our Idea Factory
From Wikipedia (in own window)
TDM Encyclopedia on BRT
ITDP's BRT Planning Guide (draft for comment)
Revolution on the street
TRB's Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) BRT report
Bus Rapid Transit Policy Center
US DOT FTA BRT program
National BRT Institute, Center for Urban Transportation Research, USF
Comprehensive internatinal bibliogrpahy from GTZ SUTP
BRT Planning Guide, GTZ SUTP by Lloyd Wright, 250 pages
On this topic, one member of the BRT group recently wrote to ask us why in fact with so much good materials out there and already available, were we bothering to add more pages to the pile. Our answer is summarized below:
- Our BRT Brief will be exactly 20 pages long.
- It is aimed specifically at local government and decision makers in the public sector.
- It is intended purely to provide the necessary exception background information for the city government to decide if they want to start to look into this more closely.
- It will not try to cover much of the technical or cost details, etc. But it will zero in on the important big numbers that define this approach relatively to others.
- It is aimed at cities both North and South (important too since there has been a great deal of both early and recent work in what we call the Global South).
- It will of course refer and link directly to the best of the materials available on the topic.
- It will be balanced in its view of BRT and really look quite hard at problem aspects.
- And it won't probably be nearly as pretty as the best laid out of the above. It is a working and decision document.
Back to top
| Economic instruments, congestion charging, et al |
It was originally intended that Congestion Charging would be the topic of the second Brief in Vol. 1, however over the last months there have been many requests for early treatment of BRT, as one of the fastest developing new mobility initiatives in an increasing number of cities around the world. This decision is still in process as we concentrate our efforts at this point on getting out Vol. 1, No. 1.
Congestion Charging, et al
First words
VTPI on Congestion Pricing, Value Pricing, Toll Roads and HOT Lanes
Wikipedia on Road pricing (in own window)
Google News on Congestion Charging et al"
Idea Factory on Congestion Charging<
Idea Factory on road pricing
Better, faster, cheaper
Back to top
While we and others have been looking at this for years, but mainly out of the corners of our eyes, as part of the run-up to the Briefs we have launched an international discussion in a certain number of expert fora and are finding considerable interest. Including on showing why FPT will never work. Be that as it may, it is a superior topic for a Brief and for some first background on this we invite you to check out the following reference and working links. The Opening Letter that follows just below may be a good way to get into this.
Opening Letter inviting comments, participation
Public transport shoudl be free - Discussions 1
Public transport shoudl be free - Discussions 2
Free public transport - discussions
Bibliography 1
Bibliography 2 (TRIS)
Wikipedia entry
Back to top
| City Cycling: "The wheel of reincarnation" |
This turns out to be a lot more complex and challenging a task than most cities and companies often think. This Brief will explore the complexities and the good examples -- which will be fewer in number and certainly richer in their lessons (many of which negative by the way) than one might have at first thought. Once again, the goal is to give to the city decision makers the exception information and persepctive they need to make a decision about next steps and the details of planning and implementation.
Key issues:
Here you have an idea of the range of the issues which need to be looked at and reported in the final Brief. IF you consider the spread of this list, you may wonder how we ever intend to provide
- Cycle paths (segregated, shared) and protection
- Cycle parking and security
- Integration with other modes (including bad weather back-up, etc.)
- Public cycle programs (free and rental)
- New, better, safer cycles
- Tricycles and devices to open up cycling to people with some mobility handicaps
- Employer/employee incentive and support programs
- Strategic support from the city and other concerned agencies
- Cyclist education and qualification
- Incidents, injuries, insurance,
- Safety and enforcement
- Driver education (cars, buses, trucks)
- Children's/school cycling programs and support
- Special events, manifestations, regular city tours
- Public health aspects, obesity
- Links with cycling groups
- Cycling maps and public information
- Cycling for visitors, tourists
- Should cycling/cyclists be subsidized?
- Eco-environmental impacts (costs/benefits)
- Links between leisure, sports and transport cycling
- Goods and message delivery services by cycle
- Walking, skating and cycling - Communalities and conflicts, and how to deal with them
- Cycling and equity: what is it and what does in mean
- (And what important have we left out here?)
Cycling groups, apecialised consultants, and leads thereto:
Some first references:
Content to follow here. In the meantime, some first quick references, inccluding from the Wikipedia, just to get us going, along with a Google listing that has some interest as we thrash around to see what is out there and going on:
Euro Netowrk of Cycling Expertise
Sustainable Planning &
Innovation for biCYCLES
IBF on bicycle safety (14 MM ref's)
IBF on bicycle safety (14 MM ref's)
IBF on bicycle parking
Google on bicycle parking
Victoria Transport Policy Institute - walking and cycling references/a>
VTPI - Evaluating Nonmotorized Transport
Wikipedia on Segregated cycle facilities (in own window)
Wikipedia on Utility cycling (in own window)
Wikipedia on Bicycle commuting (in own window)
Vehicular cycling (in own window)
Google on bicycles/cities
Conference Bike
Back to top
Le Frene, 8/10 rue Joseph Bara
75006 Paris, France, Europe. T: +331 4326 1323
Copyright © 1994-2007 The
Commons ® All rights reserved.
Last updated on 5 September 2007
|